Presented by Louise Carr, Advanced Learning Practitioner, Associate Tutor at Hadlow College, Kent, UK

Case Study

This case study focuses on the first course in a two year programme for practising Teaching Assistants who attend the college's University Centre for an intensive 1 day a week. Some are new to their profession others established and experienced in the field. They will have a variety of educational and cultural backgrounds and experiences that will impact on their engagement with the course.

Hadlow-Group-logo-for-web.jpg

Outline course specifications

This work-based learning course is central to the cultivation of a reflective and research informed approach to professional practice in the workplace or work placement. Students will be encouraged to evaluate their own professional skills, abilities and competencies, compare these with those required for their occupation, profession or workplace, and thus form a basis for their own continued professional development. It also provides an opportunity for students to reflect on their prior experiential learning and evaluate current practice. Evidence will be gathered in a professional practice portfolio, which will subsequently form the basis for their ongoing professional development. (Course specification document 2017/18)

An integrated Skills + content approach for portfolio building

  • Using diagnostic tools and RAG rating for initial assessment diagnostics
  • Use a scaffolding framework linking minimum expectations for  content but...
  • ...linked to possible artefact types
  • teach using those artefacts as  models
  • use regular formative assessment including self, ipsative and peer
  • create support networks including forums, study partners and champions
  • build on existing institutional support and include SS specialists in e-portfolio community of practice
  • add to the LRC bitesize support and bank of how-to guides in different media format
  • introduce Katz model early and adapt to this experience

Aligning the taxonomies

Conclusion

  • It was helpful to recognise that for some a lack of confidence using Mahara may have different underlying problems which need to be addressed with different strategies.
  • Using stress and developmental models helping me to focus on less generic and more differentiated activities at the planning stage of my next course delivery.

Highs and lows

Highs

  • Facilities, (computer access, WIFI, technical support)
  • Materials
  • Experience and expertise

Lows

  • Some students found the concept of portfolio-ing difficult 
  • Wanted a framework to gauge their uncertainties
  • More challenges and barriers than I had anticipated or planned for

 

 

Challenges

  • New to Higher Education
  • New to the role of TA
  • New to ePortfolios
  • New to Mahara
  • New to reflecting on practice

Effect on the students

The more boxes that the learners ticked -  the greater potential for stress 

 gyser.jpg

 (Scott Ellis  www.vsellis.com, flickr)

Common responses to stress are fight, flight or freeze:

  • Fight: Why am I doing this? Can’t I use… (alternatives)? 
  • Flight: Little work after initial period; limited use of artefacts and layouts
  • Freeze: no progress lots of worried emails/requests for tutorial

Fight

Flight

Freeze

Inclusion

Central tenet: Inclusivity in teaching, learning and assessment 

  • create safe collaborative spaces by setting ground rules for collaborative  learning behaviour 
  • supporting learners to be OK with getting stuck, being uncertain and making mistakes  - knowing it is OK to be unique and different
  • work with their prior knowledge
  • ensure opportunities for social learning
  • use a range of assessment techniques 
  • ensure variety in the form of feedback 

 (Hockings et al., 2010 and James et al 2009)