If you want to keep any assessment data within your LMS, it might be best to use the LMS tools for that. One trick that people use who cannot use the Mahara assignment submission plugin because they either don't have Moodle or because they can't / want to install a plugin, is to create a secret URL of the portfolio and then paste that into a regular LMS assignment. And then you can apply any of your grading methods and the lecturer accesses the portfolio via the link.
Another possibility, esp. if you don't want to deal with secret URLs is that that students share their page with the faculty and then put the link into the assignment like above. That way, they can be ensured that only their faculty have access to their portfolio.
Cheers
Kristina
]]>
good stuff.
]]>
and for my teacher candidates as well.
thanks
tim
]]>Check out 'Rubrics for Assessment - EdTechTeacher' - http://edtechteacher.org/assessment/
In particular see https://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/eportfoliorubric.html
Cheers
Phil
]]>There is no also a rubric plugin available (on Github, screenshot) that you might want to take a look at in order to set up a rubric. I asked the plugin developer if he has some instructions on how to install it and will share them once I have them.
Cheers
Kristina
]]>
I will take a look and also pass this on.
]]>
He might want to check out the AAC&U VALUE rubrics from the US:
https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics
VALUE = "Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education"
]]>A colleague of mine asked this question of me in regards to using Mahara as part of the presentation of an adjudicated (pass/fail) e-portfolio (mahara) at the Masters level in a school of public policy.
"Are there rubrics for competency-based portfolio self-assessment and faculty validation-assessment that might be adapted for our purposes (rigor and relevance)?"
I think he wants to know if there is a rubric for judging the structure perhaps completeness of a portfolio in terms of meeting competencies outlined, not perhaps the content. i.e. what makes a good ePort. Of course I would think that is entirely dependent on the outcomes decided upon.
Or perhaps he is asking about the process of assessment using the ePort.
Anyway, hope that makes sense
Comments welcome
thanks
]]>